🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the nation's top court has allowed Texas to use a redrawn congressional map that is projected to include as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had rejected the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Rationale

The district court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, causing considerable confusion and upsetting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its decision.

The district court had determined that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to revert to the maps established after the last decennial survey for the upcoming election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's ruling. She argued that it undermined the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas citizens, for no good reason, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the law of the land.

National Map-Drawing Fight

The court's action occurs during a nationwide contest over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing happens after a new decade's census. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to initiate a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier this year triggered a chain reaction among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that could add a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have countered with new maps in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Political Reactions

The Texas top lawyer welcomed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures representation favorable to the GOP. Our state is leading the charge to reclaim the nation, one district and one state at a time, he remarked.

In contrast, opposition party representatives criticized the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major Democratic election organization.

Another senior House leader stated the court had yet again shredded its credibility by approving a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.